Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 360 SW2D 722 - State v. Sanders

State v. Sanders’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 1999 · most notably State v. Wise (1994), State v. Engleman (1982)

30 state decisions

2101962197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Castino · State v. Hudson · State v. Turner · State v. Foster · State v. Menz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * [T]he court must always maintain an absolute impartiality in any trial, both in its remarks and in its conduct generally * * *.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]n * * * State v. Sanders, Mo., 360 S.W.2d 722 , 725 * * * the Court said that `* * * a witness' credibility may not be attacked by showing a mere arrest, investigation, or criminal charge which has not resulted in a conviction * * *'.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “An exception to the [arrest] rule has infrequently been noted where the inquiry showed a specific interest of the witness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.