Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 361 F.2d 319 - Morrison v. New York Central Railroad

Morrison v. New York Central Railroad’s Empirical Analysis

361 F.2d 319 · 1966

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2011

16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

70196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rogers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad · Ferguson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. · Page v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. · Page v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. · Ganotis v. New York Central Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`An injury or damage is proximately caused by an act, or failure to act, whenever it appears, from a preponderance of the evidence in the case, that the act or omission played any part, no matter how small, in bringing about or actually causing the injury or damage. So, if you should find, from the evidence in the case, that any negligence of the defendant contributed, in any way or manner, toward any injury or damage suffered by the plaintiff, you may find that such injury or damage was proximately caused by the defendant's act or omission.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “plaintiff's own negligence was the sole proximate cause of his injuries.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.