Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

361 F.2d 478

Docket No. 20038.

Page v. U. S. Divers Co.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1966-04-29

2 counsel of record

Relies on Page v. U. S. Divers Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1966-04-29

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 1984

10 federal appellate ·

120196619701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Gene W. Arant, Jerome Schwimmer, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.

Robert W. Fulwider, Perry E. Turner, Fulwider, Patton, Rieber, Lee & Utecht, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before MERRILL and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, District judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

At issue is the validity of United States Patent No. Re. 25,122, a reissue of Patent No. 2,823,670, held by Appellant. The District Court has ruled it invalid for lack of invention.

¶2

The controlling issues upon this appeal were presented to the District Court and were dealt with by the District Judge in his Memorandum Opinion filed October 9, 1964, 235 F.Supp. 554. For the reasons there set forth judgment is affirmed.

/361/f2d/478 · .json · Public domain