Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 361 F.2d 627 - Cloud v. United States

Cloud v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

361 F.2d 627 · 1966

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
April 1979
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2314

Relies on United States v. Gainey · Bruno v. United States · United States v. Romano · Armstrong v. United States · United States v. Allegrucci

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Possession of property recently stolen, if not satisfactorily explained, is ordinarily a circumstance from which the jury may reasonably draw the inference and find, in the light of surrounding circumstances shown by the evidence in the case, that the person in possession knew that the property had been stolen, * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.