Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 361 F.2d 75 - Dancy v. United States

Dancy v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

361 F.2d 75 · 1965

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
August 1998
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 1998 · most notably Mason v. United States (1969), Coleman v. Burnett (1973)

24 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

1901965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2106

Relies on Pollard v. United States · Fiswick v. United States · St. Pierre v. United States · Rosenblatt v. Baer · Wood v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “defense counsel's conduct of the cross-examination of witnesses at the trial reflects a tentative and probing approach due to his ignorance of certain doubtful areas in the government's proof which might well have been known to him had he been able to participate in the preliminary hearing”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “be disregarded and set at naught with impunity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.