Eusebio v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
361 F.3d 1088 · 2004
Citation profile
44 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Ngure v. Ashcroft (2004), Ai Feng Yuan v. United States Department of Justice (2005)
44 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Mead Corp. · Saideh Fisher v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Prasad v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Laeila Nelson Stephanie Nelson Phil Nelson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Kapcia v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“determine that it would not be possible for a reasonable fact-finder to adopt the BIA's position.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[M]inor beatings ... do not amount to political persecution, even if government officials are motivated by political animus.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“who is unable or unwilling to return to, and is unable or unwilling to avail himself or herself of the protection of, [his or her country of nationality] because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.