Prieto v. Malgor’s Empirical Analysis
361 F.3d 1313 · 2004
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Romero v. Drummond Co. (2008), OFS Fitel, LLC v. Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C. (2008)
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on 679 So. 2d 729 - McGhee v. Volusia County · Griffith v. General Motors Corp. · Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Signtech USA, Ltd. · KW Plastics v. United States Can Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] complete statement of all opinions to be expressed and the basis and reasons therefor; the data or other information considered by the witness in forming the opinions; any exhibits to be used as a summary of or support for the opinions; the qualifications of the witness, including a list of all publications authored by the witness within the preceding ten years; the compensation to be paid for the study and testimony; and a listing of any other cases in which the witness has testified as an expert at trial or by deposition within the preceding four years.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“containing 'a complete statement of all opinions to be expressed and the basis and reasons therefor,' as well as information about the data considered, the witness' qualifications, the compensation earned, and any other recent cases in which he or she offered testimony.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“who is retained or specially employed to provide expert testimony in the case ...”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.