Lutwin v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
361 F.3d 146 · 2004
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Mathews v. Eldridge · Heckler v. Ringer · Christopher Former Secretary of State et al. v. Harbury · Shalala Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“), we set forth below only such facts as are necessary to resolve this appeal. 3 When the plaintiffs first brought suit, Medicare beneficiaries confronted with an adverse coverage determination by an HHA could obtain review of that decision only if they satisfied two conditions. First, they had to request that the HHA submit a claim to the Health Care Financing Administration (the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Healey v. Leavitt“plaintiffs have a legal right to a written: (1) pre-deprivation statement why the HHA believes Medicare may not . . . cover their services . . . (2) explanation of the circumstances in which a beneficiary has the right to have a demand bill submitted, and (3) disclosure of information regarding a patient's right to appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Healey v. Leavitt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.