United States v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
361 F.3d 288 · 2004
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2401
Relies on Geyen v. Marsh · Polanco v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration · United States of America v. Gabriel Rodriguez-Aguirre Eleno Aguirre · United States v. Minor · Clymore v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[the claimant] was on reasonable inquiry notice about the forfeiture, i.e., the earlier of the following: when he has become aware that the government had declared the property forfeited, or when an inquiry that he could reasonably have been expected to make would have made him aware of the forfeiture.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he six-year statute of limitations in 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a) is appropriate . . . and so we shall borrow it for Rule 41(g) motions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.