Doe I’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably In re C.P. (2012), Doe v. State (2008)
2 district · 16 state decisions — followed in 12 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Washington v. Glucksberg · Smith v. Doe · Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe · Doe v. Otte
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“persons who have been convicted of serious sex offenses do not have a fundamental right to be free from the registration and notification requirements set forth in the Alaska statute.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“due process does not require the opportunity to prove a fact that is not material to the State's statutory scheme.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McCabe v. Com. · In Re WM“possess liberty interests that are indeed important.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McCabe v. Com. · In Re WM
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.