Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 361 N.C. 41 - State v. Blackwell

State v. Blackwell’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

152
cited by 152 later decisions
2
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

148 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 152 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably State v. Oglesby (2007), State v. Hurt (2007)

148 state decisions

1250200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Neder v. United States · United States v. Gaudin · City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 152 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] defendant may not avoid a conclusion that evidence of an aggravating factor is “uncontroverted” by merely raising an objection at trial. See, e.g., Neder, 527 U.S. at 19 , 144 L. Ed. 2d at 47 . Instead, the defendant must “bring forth facts contesting the omitted element,” and must have “raised evidence sufficient to support a contrary finding.” Id.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he “statutory maximum” for Apprendi purposes is the maximum sentence a judge may impose solely on the basis of the facts reflected in the jury verdict or admitted by the defendant. In other words, the relevant “statutory maximum” is not the maximum sentence a judge may impose after finding additional facts, but the maximum [the judge] may impose without any additional findings.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.