Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 361 N.C. 438 - State v. Cummings

State v. Cummings’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

84 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wainwright v. Witt · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Lord Electric Co. v. United States · Morgan v. Illinois · Nebraska v. Wyoming

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he plain error rule ... is always to be applied cautiously and only in the exceptional case where, after reviewing the entire record, it can be said the claimed error is a fundamental error, something so basic, so prejudicial, so lacking in its elements that justice cannot have been done, or where [the error] is grave error which amounts to a denial of a fundamental right of the accused, or the error has resulted in a miscarriage of justice or in the denial to appellant of a fair trial or where the error is such as to seriously affect the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings or where it can be fairly said the instructional mistake had a probable impact on the jury’s finding that the defendant was guilty.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “A trial court abuses its discretion if its determination is manifestly unsupported by reason and is so arbitrary that it could not have been the result of a reasoned decision. In our review, we consider not whether we might disagree with the trial court, but whether the trial court’s actions are fairly supported by the record.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[B]efore engaging in plain error analysis it is necessary to determine whether the instruction complained of constitutes error.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.