361 N.J. Super. 502 - State v. Maxwell’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Sedillo v. United States · Akers v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Presently, ... the definition of “sexual intercourse” in the sexual assault statute includes any intrusion of any part of a person’s body or of any object into the genital or anal opening of another person. This proposal clarifies that the intrusion of the body part or object may be caused by the direct act of the offender (defendant) or may occur as a result of an act by the victim which is done in compliance with instructions of the offender (defendant).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Steffes v. Pollard“the trial court erred in denying the motion to dismiss counts three through fourteen of the indictment [the endangering counts] because the State did not present any evidence that defendant was in the victims' physical presence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“cunnilingus . . . or insertion of the hand, finger or object into the anus or vagina either by the actor or upon the actor's instruction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.