State v. Haugen’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

11 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “presence of facts falling into the categories of estimator and system variables raises serious questions about the reliability, and, thus, the probative value, of the eyewitness identifications. If so, then we must consider whether there is little likelihood that [applying Classen ] affected the verdict.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 292 Or. App. 8 - State v. Rives

2. “[i]n other words, defendant argued that the probative value of the evidence should be determined by considering the relative reliability of the eyewitness testimony, given the system variables and the estimator variables, as explained in Lawson/James .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 292 Or. App. 8 - State v. Rives

3. “must be permitted to supplement the record with any additional evidence that may bear on the reliability of the eyewitness identification *** and present arguments regarding the appropriate application of the procedures set out in Lawson/James .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 292 Or. App. 8 - State v. Rives