Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 361 OR 47 - State v. Morgan

State v. Morgan’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the state, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “typically connote an intent to facilitate an outcome. If one were to describe a person as 'assisting' another, the listener would immediately wonder what outcome the individual was trying to achieve. * * * To connote assistance without the intent to facilitate the outcome, one generally would use an additional modifying adverb, such as 'unintentionally' or 'unwittingly.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]ith the intent to promote or facilitate the commission of the crime”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.