State v. Ritz’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Nothing in this section [ORS 813.100 ] precludes a police officer from obtaining a chemical test of the person's breath or blood through any lawful means for use as evidence in a criminal or civil proceeding including, but not limited to, obtaining a search warrant."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Swan“at the time that officers entered defendant's home, they had no reason to think that obtaining a warrant to enter the home would delay a consensual search for defendant's BAC evidence, because they had no reason to think that defendant would consent to such a search.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“refuses the request of a police officer to submit to the chemical test after the person has been informed of consequences and rights as described in ORS 813.130,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Swan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.