361 Pa. Super. 350 - Brooks v. Marriott Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably 426 Pa. Super. 105 - Kryeski v. Schott Glass Technologies, Inc. (1993), Barber v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (1989)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Millison v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. · 279 Pa. Super. 382 - Mike v. Borough of Aliquippa · Readinger v. Gottschall · Evans v. Allentown Portland Cement Co. · 343 Pa. Super. 411 - Jones v. P.M.A. Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]his exception to the Act applies to situations in which the third party’s acts were motivated by a feeling of animus against the particular person injured. If the third party would have attacked a different person in the same position as the injured employe, that attack falls outside the exception and is covered exclusively by the Act.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“If disability or death is compensable under this act, a person shall not be liable to anyone at common law or otherwise on account of such disability or death for any act or omission occurring while such person was in the same employ as the person disabled or killed, except for intentional wrong. 1939, June 21, P.L. 566, § 205, added 1963, Aug. 24, P.L. 1174, § 1. (Emphasis added.) 11”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.