Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 361 So. 2d 1182 - Tyson v. State

361 So. 2d 1182 - Tyson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently May 2009 · most notably 380 So. 2d 940 - House v. State (1979), Ex Parte Hightower (1983)

37 state decisions

1701978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Russell · Sorrells v. United States · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · West Virginia ex rel. Sublett v. Adams · Mason v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Entrapment occurs when State officers or persons under their control, incite, induce, lure, or instigate a person into committing a criminal offense, which that person would not have otherwise committed, and had no intention of committing."”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The oral charge need not state the legal principle exactly as it appears in the requested charge. The principle expressed in the requested charge need only be fairly and substantially covered in the trial court's oral charge.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"The defendant must first come forward with evidence sufficient to raise a jury issue `hat the Government's conduct created a substantial risk that the offense would be committed by a person other than one ready to commit it'. United States v. Mosley , 496 F.2d 1012 , 1014 (5th Cir. 1974) citing Pierce v. United States , 414 F.2d 163 , 168 (5th Cir. 1969). Once such issue is raised, the Government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant was predisposed to commit the charged offense. Id. See also, United States v. Gomez-Rojas , 507 F.2d 1213 , 1218 (5th Cir. 1975). By relying on entrapment as a defense, an accused exposes himself to a `searching inquiry into his own conduct and predisposition . . .' Sorrells v. United States , 287 U.S. 435 , 451 , 53 S.Ct. 210 , 216 , 77 L.Ed. 413 (1932). To negative the defense, the government may introduce evidence to prove predisposition which is otherwise inadmissible. United States v. Moriarty , 497 F.2d 486 , 488 (5th Cir. 1974); United States v. Simon , 488 F.2d 133 (5th Cir. 1973)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.