Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

361 So. 2d 829

Bender v. Bender

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 15, 1978

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1978-08-15

Relies on 334 So. 2d 13 - Shaw v. Shaw · 346 So. 2d 56 - Herzog v. Herzog

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1978-08-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 160 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2017 · most notably Oregon v. Elstad (1985), Tenneco Inc. v. Enterprise Products Co. (1996)

2 federal appellate · 147 state decisions

100019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This appeal is by the husband from that portion of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage relating to an award of lump sum and permanent alimony to the wife.

¶2It is appellant’s contention that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding the wife the marital home as lump sum alimony and $140.00 per week permanent alimony because the award was not based on the appellant’s financial ability to pay such an award.

¶3An appellate court will not interfere in the determination of the amount of alimony in the absence of a clear showing of an abuse of discretion.

¶4The appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion. Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977).

¶5Affirmed.

/361/so2d/829 · .json · Public domain