Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 361 SW2D 448 - State v. Curtis

State v. Curtis’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
February 2003
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2003

11 state decisions

8019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Austin v. Cannizzo · State v. Oakley · Hays v. State · 29 Tex. Civ. App. 429 - Sullivan v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. · Robards v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Another element of the required similarity is that the comparable sales must be betweeti a willing seller and a willing buyer. A purchase by a condemning authority is not free and voluntary.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.