Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 361 S.W.2d 470 - Wagner v. Pulliam

Wagner v. Pulliam’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 2007
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2007

10 state decisions

7019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Gulf Television Co. · Pure Oil Co. v. Tunnell · Smith v. Hall · Youngs v. Youngs · Batex Oil Company v. La Brisa Land and Cattle Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A formal petition which substantially follows the provisions of the rule is sufficient even though the allegations may be fictitious. Where a plaintiff complies with the requirements of the rule he is not required to allege facts which show his right to recover.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where the venue depends on the nature of the suit, such venue is ordinarily determined by the nature of the principal right asserted and the relief sought for the breach thereof.” (Emphasis ours).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.