Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 361 SW2D 697 - Hasemeier v. Smith

Hasemeier v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
3
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably Mahoney v. Doerhoff Surgical Services, Inc. (1991), Nicholson v. Nicholson (1985)

2 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

120196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Maybach v. Falstaff Brewing Corp. · Oldis v. La Societe Francaise De Bienfaisance Mutuelle · Loudon v. Scott · Stallman v. Robinson · Williams v. Chamberlain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[iü]es ipsa loquitur is a rule of evidence whereby a submissible issue of negligence may be made by adducing a particular kind of circumstantial evidence, viz., by showing the fact of an occurrence which, because of its character and circumstances, permits a jury to draw a rebuttable inference, based on the common knowledge or experience of laymen, that the causes of the occurrence in question do not ordinarily exist in the absence of negligence on the part of the one in control.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When a petition is dismissed on the ground that it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, the ensuing judgment of dismissal is final and ap-pealable. The fact that the plaintiff may, if he chooses, bring another action for the same cause does not alter the fact that that judgment was a final adjudication as to that petition and if plaintiff chose to stand on that petition, the judgment was final and appealable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.