Milner v. Milner’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
31 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth))
Relationships
Relies on Coker v. Coker · J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. Webster · Padilla v. LaFrance · Seagull Energy E & P, Inc. v. Eland Energy, Inc. · Chrysler Insurance Co. v. Greenspoint Dodge of Houston, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] right or expectancy in something (such as a trust or an estate), as opposed to legal title to that thing” (alteration in original)) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionaiy 885 (9th ed.2009)); accord In re Estate of Sullivan, 724 N.W.2d 532 (Minn.Ct.App.2006) (also applying the definition in Black's Law Dictionary). The Probate Code does define a”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilson v. Dallas · Sneed v. Webre“(1) provides, in a prominently displayed statement that is in boldfaced type or capital letters or underlined, that the agreement is not subject to revocation; (2) is signed by each party to the agreement; and (3) is signed by the party’s attorney, if any, who is present at the time the agreement is signed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“requires the rendition of a divorce decree that adopts the parties' agreement”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.