Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 361 S.W.3d 694 - Wirth v. State

Wirth v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana))

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Clewis v. State · Brooks v. State · Rausch v. United States · Cavazos v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “promising performance that is likely to affect the judgment of another in the transaction and that the actor does not intend to perform or knows will not be performed .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “criminally responsible for an offense committed by the conduct of another[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “by the conduct of another for which he is criminally responsible[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.