Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 361 SW3D 902 - Copley v. Commonwealth

Copley v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Searp · United States v. Vasser · Brock v. Commonwealth · Meece v. Commonwealth · State v. Torres

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen a criminal procedural] rule is violated but the defendant’s constitutional rights are not affected, suppression may still be warranted if there is (1) prejudice to the defendant, in the sense that the search might not have occurred or been so abusive if the rule had been followed or (2) if there is evidence of deliberate disregard of the rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.