Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 361 U.S. 354 - Davis v. Virginian Railway Co.

Davis v. Virginian Railway Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

119
cited by 119 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
13
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 6 district · 56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 119 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2024 · most notably Bruni v. Tatsumi (1976), 72 Ill. 2d 249 - Walski v. Tiesenga (1978)

37 federal appellate · 6 district · 56 state decisions — followed in 13 states

5501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 45 U.S.C. § 51 (Federal Employers' Liability Act)

Relies on Rogers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad · Lavender v. Kurn · Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. · Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad · Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 119 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Proof of malpractice, in effect, requires two evidentiary steps: evidence as to the recognized standard of the medical community in the particular kind of case, and a showing that the physician in question negligently departed from this standard in his treatment of plaintiff. [A physician testified the treatment was not proper.] This offer of proof was fatally deficient. No foundation was laid as to the recognized medical standard for the treatment of such a fracture.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.