Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 361 U.S. 905 - English v. Cunningham

English v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

217
cited by 217 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

148 federal appellate · 5 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 217 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2019 · most notably Iron Workers Local # 272 v. Bowen (1980), Securities & Exchange Commission v. Murphy (1980)

148 federal appellate · 5 district · 12 state decisions — followed in 12 states

9601959196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on English v. Cunningham · English v. Cunningham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 217 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “). Thus, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has pointed out that the standard for disqualifying an agency member because of prejudgment in an adjudicatory proceeding is whether”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.