361 Wis. 2d 773 - State v. McKellips’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · Vollmer v. Luety · 213 Wis. 2d 488 - State v. Castillo · 202 Wis. 2d 150 - State v. Hicks · 98 Wis. 2d 301 - Air Wisconsin, Inc. v. North Central Airlines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in two ways. First, we know that one example of using such a system is sending email messages. Second, paragraph (3)(g) informs us that a computer or other device, i.e., hardware, cannot itself constitute a computerized communication system because that paragraph distinguishes the two.19 ¶83 Second, Wis. Stat. § 48.825 also uses the phrase”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“an account created within a bounded system established by an Internet-based service that requires a user to input or store access information in an electronic device in order to view, create, use, or edit the user's account information, profile, display, communications, or stored data.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“McKellips, 361 Wis. 2d 773, ¶13 (citing § 947.0125(3)(g)). Section 48.825 refers to communications 'by any computerized communication system, including by electronic mail, Internet site, Internet account, or any similar medium of communication provided via the Internet.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.