United States v. Anthony D'antonio, United States of America v. Joseph Spagnoli, United States of America v. Louis Bartemio and Arthur Rachel’s Empirical Analysis
362 F.2d 151 · 1966
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 1991 · most notably United States v. Tanner (1972), Munn v. Algee (1991)
25 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Krulewitch v. United States · Lutwak v. United States · Dennis v. United States · Braverman v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The minor errors we have found in this lengthy trial do not in our opinion warrant, much less require, a reversal. An accused is entitled to a fair trial, but not to a trial free of all error. Lutwak v. United States, 344 U.S. 604 , 619 [ 73 S.Ct. 481 , 97 L.Ed. 593 ]. Unsubstantial error , is not to be viewed in an attitude separated from reality and oblivious to the content of the record and as thus isolated relied upon to furnish the basis for reversal. Otherwise, a judgment which could be affirmed would be almost impossible to achieve.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.