Newland v. Edgar’s Empirical Analysis
362 F.2d 911 · 1966
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 1983
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fred Bardes v. First National Bank of Hawarden Iowa · Gerling v. Baltimore Ohio R Co · State v. United States · Spencer v. W · Mitchell v. McClure
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Is the interest of the absent party distinct and severable? (2) In the absence of such party, can the court render justice between the parties before it? (3) Will the decree made, in the absence of such party, have no injurious effect on the interest of such absent party? ‘ ■ ' (4) Will the final determination, in the absence of such party, be consistent with equity and good conscience?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Anderson v. Anderson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.