Del Piano v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
362 F.2d 931 · 1966
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 1983
19 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on MacHibroda v. United States · United States v. Hayman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and contends that no such protected information was related by the attorney to F.B.I. agents. Discussion Section 2255 provides in part: 16 Unless the motion and the files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, the court shall cause notice thereof to be served upon the United States attorney, grant a prompt hearing thereon, determine the issues and make findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect thereto. 17 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (emphasis added). 18 It is well established that where a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“motion for relief under § 2255 raises an issue of fact which cannot be conclusively determined from 'the motions and the files and records of the case,' the movant is entitled to a judicial hearing at which he and his witnesses may be heard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.