Cozza v. Network Associates, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
362 F.3d 12 · 2004
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2024
12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 16 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 4
Relies on Restoration Preservation Masonry, Inc. v. Grove Europe Ltd. · Fisichelli v. City Known as the Town of Methuen · Xerox Financial Services Life Insurance v. High Plains Ltd. Partnership · Colón v. R.K. Grace & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“resolution of a complex jurisdictional issue may be avoided when the merits can easily be resolved in favor of the party challenging jurisdiction,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A party] cannot seriously argue any entitlement to bring successive interlocutory appeals based upon the same arguments [already rejected], nor to appeal arguments which it could have appealed earlier, but did not.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.