Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 362 F.3d 395 - Ford v. Johnson

Ford v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

362 F.3d 395 · 2004

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
1
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably Greeno v. Daley (2005), Conyers v. Abitz (2005)

23 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

300200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on Harris v. Reed · V. C O Churner · Correction Officer Porters v. Ronald Nussle · McNeil v. United States · Hallstrom v. Tillamook County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an action is 'brought' for purposes of [the PLRA exhaustion requirement] when the complaint is tendered to the district clerk”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “by dismissing a suit that begins too soon, even if the plaintiff exhausts his administrative remedies while the litigation is pending.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`got under way' or some similar phrase [to ensure] that the litigation does not start until the administrative process has ended.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.