Baskins v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 1998
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Morrissey v. Brewer · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Carafas v. J · Jones v. Cunningham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This court concludes the South Carolina Post Conviction Relief Act encompasses an action by a petitioner seeking an initial declaration that procedures employed by the Parole Board are unconstitutional and seeking by way of such a declaration a second proceeding by which he might ultimately secure his release.” Baskins v. Moore, 362 F.Supp. 187, 193 (D.S.C. 1973).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Ouimette“petitioner’s claim is of the core of habeas, petitioner must exhaust either by way of the statutory procedural device — Section 17-601 et seq. [the predecessor statute to § 17-27-20] — or, if Section 17-601 be deemed inadequate or ineffective, by way of writ of habeas corpus filed with the South Carolina Supreme Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pennington v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.