362 F. Supp. 2d 195 - Perles v. Kagy’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
5 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Copeland v. Marshall · Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. · National Association of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of Defense Green · 572 F. Supp. 354 - Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he confusion[] surrounding the term 'quantum meruit' is by no means unique to the District of Columbia [cjourts”). Peñes identifies three distinct ways in which D.C. courts treat quantum meruit. One line of cases equates quantum meruit with implied-in-fact contract; another line of cases equates it with quasi contract; and a third line of cases treats a request for quantum meruit relief not as a separate legal theory of recovery, but rather as a measure of damages,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.