362 Ill. App. 3d 1093 - People v. Sanchez’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Mendenhall · 211 Ill. 2d 502 - People v. Pitman · 191 Ill. 2d 37 - In Re GO · 192 Ill. 2d 592 - People v. Sims · 214 Ill. 2d 476 - People v. Lee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If he so requests, the competent authorities of the receiving State shall, without delay, inform the consular post of the sending State, if within its consular district, a national of that State is arrested or committed to prison or to custody pending trial or is detained in any other manner. Any communication addressed to the consular post by the person arrested, in person, custody or detention shall also be forwarded by the said authorities without delay. The said authorities shall inform the person concerned without delay of his rights under this sub-paragraph.” Vienna Convention, art. 36(l)(b), 21 U.S.T. at 101, 596 U.N.T.S. at_.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.