362 Ill. App. 3d 1202 - People v. James’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2025
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 216 Ill. 2d 481 - People v. Sharpe · 163 Ill. 2d 250 - People v. Hickman · 206 Ill. 2d 503 - People v. Moss · 216 Ill. 2d 533 - People v. Guevara · 213 Ill. 2d 509 - People v. Breedlove
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A defendant has the right to proceed either pro se or through counsel; he has no right to some sort of hybrid representation whereby he would receive the services of counsel and still be permitted to file pro se motions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Bell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.