Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

362 Mass. 877

Commonwealth v. Veal

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 3, 1972

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1972-11-03

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1981

4 state decisions

Relies on Commonwealth v. Iannello · Commonwealth v. Nunes · Commonwealth v. Ladetto

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1972-11-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1On this appeal which is here under the provisions of G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G, the defendant assigns as error joinder for trial of separate offences in two counts of one indictment. Each count alleges an unlawful sale of heroin, which sales allegedly occurred nine days apart. The judge did not abuse his discretion in the denial of the pre-trial motion for severance. The offences were kindred and liable to punishment of the same general character. See Commonwealth v. Iannello, 344 Mass. 723, 727-728; Commonwealth v. Blow, ante, 196, 200. The defendant complains also of the introduction of evidence of previous convictions which when offered by the Commonwealth was not objected to. Commonwealth v. Nunes, 351 Mass. 401, 405. Evidence of prior convictions of the defendant was properly admitted. Commonwealth v. Ladetto, 353 Mass. 746. Subilosky v. Commonwealth, 358 *878Mass. 390, 395-396. There was no error in refusing the defendant the opportunity to explain his prior convictions. Commonwealth v. Callahan, 358 Mass. 808.

The case was submitted on briefs.Robert V. Greco & Reuben Goodman, for the defendant.Garrett H. Byrne, District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.

¶2Judgments affirmed.

/362/mass/877 · .json · Public domain