Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 362 Mo. 598 - Bedell v. Daugherty

Bedell v. Daugherty’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
April 1996
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently April 1996 · most notably Travelers Indemnity Company v. Chumbley (1965), Powers v. Shore (1952)

36 state decisions

16019511960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gerber v. Schutte Investment Co. · 231 Mo. App. 187 - Jones v. West Side Buick Co. · Gabriel v. Borowy · Branner v. Klaber · Griffith v. Gardner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘As to the second objection, the representations alleged’, said the court, ‘were not merely as to future intentions, but were false statements as to existing facts. Where a present intention, even though as to future conduct, is predicated upon or evidenced by false statements as to existing facts, such statements, if relied on, constitute actionable fraud.’ This is the rule in Missouri.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`plaintiff does not seek to set aside the certificate. He recognizes its finality. * * * The fraud is essentially in the deceitful method employed to obtain the certificate and in its use.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “immediate personal use and occupancy as housing accommodations”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.