Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 362 N.C. 1 - State v. Raines

State v. Raines’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

50 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Crawford v. Washington · Payne v. Tennessee · Sutton v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n order for a party to preserve for appellate review the exclusion of evidence, the significance of the excluded evidence must be made to appear in the record and a specific offer of proof is required unless the significance of the evidence is obvious from the record. We also held that the essential content or substance of the witness' testimony must be shown before we can ascertain whether prejudicial error occurred.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`be convinced that absent the error the jury probably would have reached a different verdict.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] reversal for plain error is only appropriate in the most exceptional cases.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.