Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 362 N.C. 27 - Gore v. Myrtle/Mueller

Gore v. Myrtle/Mueller’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably 193 N.C. App. 86 - Meares v. Dana Corp. (2008), 210 N.C. App. 522 - Cleveland Construction, Inc. v. Ellis-Don Construction, Inc. (2011)

49 state decisions

420200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Adams v. AVX Corp. · Forbis v. Neal · Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY · Deese v. Champion International Corp. · Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Conduct which amounts to a false representation or concealment of material facts, or at least, which is reasonably calculated to convey the impression that the facts are otherwise than, and inconsistent with, those which the party after-wards attempts to assert; (2) intention or expectation that such conduct shall be acted upon by the other party, or conduct which at least is calculated to induce a reasonably prudent person to believe such conduct was intended or expected to be relied and acted upon; (3) knowledge, actual or constructive, of the real facts.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a) The right to compensation under this Article shall be forever barred unless (i) a claim ... is filed with the Commission or the employee is paid compensation as provided under this Article within two years after the accident or (ii) a claim ... is filed with the Commission within two years after the last payment of medical compensation when no other compensation has been paid and when the employer's liability has not otherwise been established under this Article.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In cases involving complicated medical questions far removed from the ordinary experience and knowledge of laymen, only an expert can give competent opinion evidence as to the cause of the injury. However, when such expert opinion testimony is based merely upon speculation and conjecture, ... it is not sufficiently reliable to qualify as competent evidence on issues of medical causation. The evidence must be such as to take the case out of the realm of conjecture and remote possibility, that is, there must be sufficient competent evidence tending to show a proximate causal relation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.