Binney v. Banner Therapy Products, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Intercraft Industries Corp. v. Morrison · 17 N.C. App. 340 - In Re Collingsworth · Williams v. Burlington Industries, Inc. · 57 N.C. App. 363 - Hagan v. Peden Steel Co. · 178 N.C. App. 417 - Binney v. Banner Therapy Products
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]onduct evincing a willful or wanton disregard of the employer's interest as is found in deliberate violation or disregard of standards of behavior that the employer has the right to expect of an employee or has explained orally or in writing to an employee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In any judicial proceeding under this section, the findings of fact by the Division, if there is any competent evidence to support them, and in the absence of fraud, shall be conclusive, and the jurisdiction of the court shall be confined to questions of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Ordinarily a claimant is presumed to be entitled to benefits under the Unemployment Compensation Act, but this is a rebuttable presumption with the burden on the employer to show circumstances which disqualify the claimant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.