Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

362 N.C. 666

669 S.E.2d 738

Crawford v. Mintz

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 2008

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 2008-12-12

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2009

6 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of the Court of Appeals, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. . . .”

quoted by 2 later decisions, including State v. Streater, 197 N.C. App. 232 - State v. Keaton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-12-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the remaining assignments of error. Plaintiffs’ petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

¶2 REVERSED AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

/362/nc/666 · .json · Public domain