Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

362 N.C. 76

Williams v. Vonderau

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 7, 2007

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 2007-12-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2008

1 state decisions

Relies on In Re AK · Robinson v. Byrd · State v. Harrison

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-12-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1On the issue of whether more than one incident of harassment is required before a trial court can enter a civil no-contact order under N.C.G.S. § 50C-1(6), the members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed without precedential value. See State v. Harrison, 360 N.C. 394, 627 S.E.2d 461 (2006); Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

¶2*77The decision of the Court of Appeals that an appeal related to a civil no-contact order is moot once the order expires is reversed. See In re A.K., 360 N.C. 449, 628 S.E.2d 753 (2006).

¶3AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
/362/nc/76 · .json · Public domain