Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 362 NW2D 509 - State v. Bair

State v. Bair’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
July 2007
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2007

12 state decisions

70198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Trudo · State v. Boyd · State v. Fitzgerald · State v. Cunha · State v. Snodgrass

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]wo or more public offenses which arose from the same transaction or occurrence or from two or more transactions or occurrences constituting parts of a common scheme or plan may be alleged and prosecuted as separate counts in a single complaint, information or indictment, unless, for good cause shown, the trial court in its discretion determines otherwise.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The trial court is to order severance where the defendant shows his or her “interest in receiving a fair trial uninfluenced by the prejudicial effects which could result from a joint trial [are] outweighed [by] the State’s interest in judicial economy.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.