State v. Tena’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Moen · State v. Johns · State v. Baughman · State v. Turnidge · State v. Flett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he doctrine of chances applies only to explain whether or not an act that a defendant performed was performed intentionally. It does not apply when there is a dispute about whether the defendant performed the act at all.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he more often a defendant intentionally performs an act, the less likely it is that, when the defendant performs the act again, he or she did so accidentally or innocently.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'motive' in this context refers to 'a cause or reason that moves the will and induces action, an inducement which leads to or tempts the mind to commit an act'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.