Strickland v. Reeburgh’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 1980
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Claybrooke v. Barnes · Burnett v. Cole · Luschen v. Stanton · Deruy v. Noah · Brooks v. Tucker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In Deruy v. Noah, 199 Okl. 230 , 185 P.2d 189, 191 , we quoted with approval from Claybrooke v. Barnes, 180 Ark. 678 , 22 S.W.2d 390 , 67 A.L.R. 1436 , as follows: “ * * * ‘Where there has been a severance of the legal interest in the minerals from the ownership of the land, adverse possession of the surface is not adverse possession of the mineral estate, even though title to the minerals be asserted all the time.’ and: ‘Where ownership of the surface and of the mineral rights has been severed, the only way the Statute of Limitations can be asserted against the owner of the mineral rights or estate is for the owner of the surface estate or some other person to take actual possession of the minerals by opening and operating mines for the statutory period.’ See also Douglass et al. v. Mounce et al., Okl., 303 P.2d 430, 433 , and cited cases.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Walker v. Hoffman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.