Oxenberg v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently February 2009 · most notably Ferrell v. Baxter (1971), Lewis v. State (1970)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Holt v. United States · Marshall v. United States · Stern v. Board of Levee Commissioners · Standard Oil Company of California v. Moore · Ellis v. Dixon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A conviction shall not be had on the testimony of an accomplice unless it is corroborated by other evidence which tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime; and the corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the crime or the circumstances of the commission.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Dimmick v. State · Anthony v. State“[I]n determining the sufficiency of corroborating evidence, the evidence need not be considered “by itself and without the aid of the testimony of the accomplice.” To meet the statutory requirement, the state must show no more than that the corroborating evidence strengthens or confirms the testimony of the accomplice; it must induce “in the mind of the jurors a rational belief that the accomplice was speaking the truth when he implicated the defendant in the criminal event.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Anthony v. State · Baker v. State“... could receive appreciable help or assistance from the opinion of the expert witness....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.