Dixon v. Dixon’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
28 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of Greenville · South Carolina Department of Natural Resources v. Town of McClellanville · Cafe Associates, Ltd. v. Gerngross · Dean v. Ruscon Corp. · Atlas Food Systems & Services, Inc. v. Crane National Vendors Division of Unidynamics Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f the vital terms of a contract are ambiguous, then, in an effort to determine the intent of the parties, the court may consider probative, extrinsic evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that the statute of limitations does not apply to actions in equity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moffitt v. Moffitt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.