Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

362 So. 2d 1008

Dukes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 27, 1978

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1978-09-27

Relies on Smith v. State · Speller v. State

Decided 1978-09-27

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, the present sentence does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975). Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975). Moreover, the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence is improper because no existing state statute provides for imprisonment at *1009hard labor as a sentence for any offense. Speller v. State, 305 So.2d 231 (Fla.2d DCA 1974). Therefore, we remand the case for correction of sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.

GRIMES, C. J., and HOBSON and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.
/362/so2d/1008 · .json · Public domain